Typographical Gags and the Patriarchy

Posted on 20 May 2007. Filed under: Comics, Feminism, Physics, Typography |

Ok, so I’m not going to comment on this…but it’s damn fun. Diesel sweeties a while back. It really is jokes about typography and the restriction of women’s ability to express themselves freely.

Here

Also misinterpretation of physics: Here.

Anyway, another lazy post. Apple Logies to all.

Make a Comment

Make a Comment: ( None so far )

blockquote and a tags work here.

  • Feed Me, See More

  • When

    May 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « Apr   Jun »
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • Plumb the Depths

  • Add Some Music to Your Day

  • When the little blue bird…

    • Bloody hangovers. Still rough, and it's miserable. This is not how you are supposed to enter a new year. Balls to 2010, already. 9 hours ago
    • My head has stopped liking me. A lot. Angrily. Hideous. 17 hours ago
    • Dobby's on @mermhart's telly show. I find myself creepy for thinking she's pretty. Damn you Peep Show. 2 days ago
    • @SaliWho Grumble bumble stumble Thanks. I still find it absurd. Though I did like the page up/down symbols. 2 days ago
    • La Belle et la Beat say 'Hello' to 2010 tomorrow night. 8 til some godawful hour, with me, Corno and JP McMurphy. Cobbler's thumb #Brighton. 2 days ago
  • Old

  • The Dirty Snake
  • Dis Clam ‘ere

    Alabaster Crippens doesn't entirely believe in objective truth, therefore he can neither confirm or deny the accuracy of any statement, image or impression caused by, or displayed on, these pages of the so called 'internet'. He does however not want to get sued, even if the lawyers, legal system, and the concept of jurisprudence doesn't exist. Therefore if you believe the nonsense posted on here you do so entirely at your own risk. In other words: Don't sue me 'cause I might not mean it. Basically, anything you hear from anyone is unreliable, so if you want the 'truth' you need the perspectives of as many people as you can get..ideally people who are trustworthy and close to the particular 'truth' you wish to inspect. If you start trusting idiots with silly (and obviously made up) names then you're developing some kind of problem. Check your sources, examine their own politcal (or other) motivation, remember that anything people say is opinion unless you are certain that they speak the 'truth'. Even your own eyes can lie. Trust me on that one. Or don't..it doesn't bother me. Finally, everything written here is, to the best of my knowledge written by me and I reserve my right to be recognised as the author of these works. Any input from other sources should be clearly shown, if you note a mistake or anything..tell me..I'll try and sort out the problem. Please ask me if you want to use anything for commercial reasons...I probably won't mind but I need to know I'm not supporting anything I don't want to support. This is an attempt at a legal notice written without legal knowledge. Just follow the principles, I think most of you get what I mean, even if it won't stand up in a court of law. Just be polite you know...like in the good ole days.

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...