Gimme Some Sass – Gender Funk

Posted on 24 June 2007. Filed under: Aggression, Analysis, Androgynism, Body Image, Boundaries, Changing the World, Chauvinism, Commodication, Confusion, Consumerism, Critique, Culture, DJing, Dancing, Debate, Electronica, Empathy, Equality, Everything, Femininity, Feminism, Gah, Gender Equality, Gender Identity, Gender Play, Gender Roles, Genderfuck, Glamour, Humps, Identity, Ideology, Individuality, Language, Mild Mania, Music, Objectification, Observations, Personal, Personal Growth, Perspective, Politics, Problems, Punk, Ramble, Rant, Rude, Self Image, Self Obsession, Self-Identity, Sex, Sexuality, Sexy, Swings and Roundabouts, Thoughts, Transgender, Women, gender, life |

So, be warned, this may not be my most forward thinking post, but I’ve been thinking about the contradictions inherent in myself recently, and thought writing about them, whilst posting some relevant videos might be something I could do on a Sunday. Apologies if I offend.

Anyway, here’s my confession. I absolutely adore sassy, sexually aggressive, punky female electro raps. It’s this little corner of the music market, and I can’t resist it. I’d like to coin the term ‘ElectroSass’ if possible. Because that is clearly what it is. Anyway, here’s two videos to demonstrate. I would’ve also included I Want U by Basment Jaxx, for a sense of balance, but it doesn’t have a YouTube.

Anyway, another warning. These videos are not for the fainthearted…or anyone with standards. Of any kind whatsoever.

Robyn – Konichiwa Bitches

Princess Superstar and Mason – Perfect (Exceeder)

So, uh…yeah.

What can one say.

Am I really celebrating the empowerment and freedom of sexually liberated women, or am I merely enjoying some gorgeous women who are willing to objectify themselves for me?

It’s a tricky one.

My first defence would be to how much I love to sing along, and I swear, I emphasise every sexual focus of it. But then, is objectifying myself really a defence against objectification of others. Not really. You don’t raise people up by lowering yourself.

However, I am thinking of creating some kind of electro drag cabaret act.

That would definitely be fun….though I might have to shave my beard.

Anyway, one element of the videos I do like is that I think both of them are actually, in themselves, challenging the act of objectification and commodification of sex in quite interesting ways.

Princess Superstar’s ludicrous make up, get up (suspenders whilst doing gymnastics…who woulda thunk) and sexual pilates, all point towards the ridiculousness of the performative nature of female sexuality in the media. She exaggerates just enough to demonstrate that it’s all absolutely ridiculous. The artificiality of the displayed sexuality just becomes impossible. You can’t help but laugh. Her celebration of her own perfection becomes parodic. The lyrics also, proclaiming her to be a powerful sexual force, perfect in every (physical) way, but by missing out so much become about the two dimensionality of a caricature of her as nothing but sexual aggressor (who of course, to fit into the necessary gender constructs, is in fact offering herself up freely, no matter who you are) and the lack of depth to that.

At least, that’s what I try to convince myself.

The Robyn video is ludicrous, of course; and almost entirely distances herself from the overtly sexual content of the song. Although in fact, it merely expresses I more symbolically. We actually see her become a string of objects. She’s not just ‘tasty like a french bonbon’ but she actually is a colourful sweety. When she’s ‘coming in your mouth make you say yum yum’, it’s not the obvious sexual act you’re thinking of (maybe) but merely her as a sweety being eaten. Is this implying the way her sexuality causes her to be subjected to oppression, and how her personality is subsumed by the assumed male listener.

Maybe.

Or I may be thinking about this too much.

I do that a lot.

So lets return to me….last weekend, at the party I DJed at. Now I put on a skirt in order to be able to play my set. Airflow helps you see (not entirely true…I just like to perform, I look good in skirts and it gets a rise out of people). Anyway, I put on a mix of the Robyn track, and dance and sing along in a quite horrific manner. But I try as much as possible to put myself on the table. Emphasise my sexuality and sexiness. Thrust myself out for people, offer myself on a plate. I’m the one bursting out of my jeans. I’m the one offering to come in your mouth. I’m the one setting fire to your house.

Now, I don’t know whether it was sexy, but it was certainly an attempt to objectify, or at least sexualise, myself.

I enjoyed it, it felt sexy, and even though clearly nobody was lapping it up, apart from finding it amusing, I felt desired and empowered.

Now, this is a strange thing, because I was consciously aware that I was putting myself in a gendered position. One that I felt shouldn’t be gendered. Was I challenging it by using my status as a man, and choosing to take on the submissive role? Was my choice making people re-evaluate their gendered identity politics, or was I simply reinforcing them? See, I am wearing a dress like a lady, that means I am sexually available and an object of desire.

I don’t know. I never know…and it’s one of my problems. Often attempting to challenge peoples stereotypes and ideas only reinforces it. Either by showing how ‘unnatural’ those who don’t conform are, or merely by reannouncing the specific qualities associated with each side of stereotypical binary.

There’s also the question of agency. By choosing to be sexualised, I have expressed more freedom than the women who are forced into that. I can choose to wear a skirt, or whatever and make myself sexualised and objectified, but many women find themselves objectified like that no matter what they wear or how they present themselves.

It annoys me that I always notice women’s bodies. I enjoy them greatly, and I know that I am just become another cog in the machine that treats women as something purely that, physically embodied desire, two dimensional and useless for anything but satisfying men’s ‘needs’. Of course I try (and almost always succeed) to rise above that, to talk to people like people, to find out about what makes people tick rather than trying to get to see them naked.

But there’s always an undercurrent, and one that makes me uncomfortable. Plus I can act funny when I’m not getting any….I become more ‘on the look out’ for sex. Obviously that’s fairly natural…but I don’t like the fact that it’s floating around in my head…like an uncontrollable monkey ready to grab and snatch at opportunities. I try not to make it affect my behaviour, but it’s not always easy.

So where does all this leave us?

Well…I’m not sure. I almost feel like I completely cancel out all my positive thought about gender abolition, my respect and involvement in feminist dialogue and the fact that I do attempt to make people re-evaluate and consider their viewpoints and attitudes. I try to get people to think about them.

But so much of it remains in the way we analyse and enjoy the world around us. I am stuck loving these cartoony representations of female sexuality (I’m talking about the songs above by the way, not Hentai). I am left unsure of my use of language at all times. It is so easy to leave standing things you mean to shatter by simply casually tossing around words and definitions in day to day conversation. You actually need to almost always be conscious of the meanings your words might conceal, as well as the ones they project.

Magazine journalism is in a terrible state these days. There is blind and thoughtless sexism everywhere, and I think it seeps out so much into every other aspect of life. The Media is almost like a distributor for pollutants. It could do so much to destroy the status quo, but it only ever reinforces it.

I don’t entirely know where that tangent came from, so I think I’m going to leave it there before this becomes even more rambled and confused. I may return to it in another post. And we all know how often the overarching themes here present themselves to me. An obsession of mine maybe.

Anyway, thoughts? Questions? or even better, how about some answers?

Make a Comment

Make a Comment: ( 6 so far )

blockquote and a tags work here.

6 Responses to “Gimme Some Sass – Gender Funk”

RSS Feed for Alabaster Crippens doesn’t know what’s going on Comments RSS Feed

You do think about this more than most people I think, and while it’s sometimes uncomfortable to be faced with the reality of the instant male reaction to female bodies (as, I think most of us girls tend to find a way to feel safe and valued as ‘people’ not objects of desire in our day to day routines, and sort of forget about being wanted first and most often, walking down the street just as a ‘body’, a physical thing. That’s hard to be aware of, I think the feminine mind finds ways around it or ways to block it outl) so while it’s sometimes hard to read about you struggling with that,

I kinda adore you for it. For caring about it so much, for wanting people to be valued as people, for women to have power and worth. I imagine lots of your female readers feel that way. Thanks for trying and caring, and giving critical attention to these ideas, Alaby. You’re one of the good guys.

I’m going to watch this space, cz I’m confused too. I’m a despicable objectifier too, as I constantly display in my blog, and considering I’ve been in the objectified person’s shoes I really haven’t learned much from it considering my post on objectification ended nowhere. All I know is, when it’s a woman verbally reducing me to a pair T&A it’s ok, I don’t feel the least bit threatened. There used to be this girl (I kid you not) who’d greet me with, “Morning V, your breasts look delicious today.” And I’d smile say ‘thank you’ and take it with some amusement. Words like ‘delectable’ nicknames like ‘voluptula’ normally would have grossed me out if it came from a guy, it’d really make me wanna puke.
Anyways, don’t recall getting such ‘compliments’ from a guy, so it doesn’t apply, most usually it’s the opposite. I can tell just from a look whether they like my body-type or not, and there’s something derogatory that’s guaranteed to go with it either way. Avoid those sort of people, unless I absolutely have to deal with them.

Thanks for the support kids.
Basically, it’s odd. I mean…I’m perhaps less worried about how the women in question feel about it (though obviously that does come in to it) as I doubt they even notice. I’m not disgusting about anything, and I’ll more likely pay a genuine compliment than simply leer. I think it’s obvious that I’m fairly sensitive…I hope.

Anyway, what concerns me more is the simplicity of the mental process. The fact that I can’t control my lustiness (though of course…I can and do). In the company of those I know and love, I’ll happily throw around banter that would fit into the objectifying/sexist/whatever scheme of things, but it’s known to merely be affectionate play. Often it’s with strangers that I find myself most reductive. By which I mean that I tend to be most likely to, not judge, but percieve the figure, shape and note the pleasure I recieve, the reaction it causes. I don’t let it affect me, and in fact, only those I pass by are left as merely a body…the second a word is shared (or even a hint of eye contact) it becomes about the body language, the personality, the communication, and everything else that is expressed and shared. Human contact makes everyone more human you see. That’s the real thing..and that’s what I actually care about.

And that might just be my answer, in the real world, with real people, there are different levels of relating, and most everyone is capable of distinguishing between the way they treat objects and the way they treat people. It’s just a question of getting everybody to draw the lines in the right places.

Not easy…but it makes sense.

Anyway, right now, I’m a bit of an emotional bundle of rags, so I’m not sure if I’m making any sense at all.

Go figure.

Aw, are you ok? :(

Anyways, the thing I noticed about that sort of compliment is never sincere coming from a man. if they embarrass you then it makes them happy. I guess I’ve just had a lot of bad luck with men. If you’re sensitive enough to leave at a sincere compliment without the intention of some sort cause and effect experiment then yeah, I’ll get it, and it won’t annoy me.

I’m a bit shaky…but surviving. I’m also a bit worried. I don’t want to be superstitious or whatnot, but I’ve got a really bad feeling about today. It started last night. I just feel like something bad is going to happen.
Probably just me being stupid.
But yeah…lots of stress is heaping on top of some personal issues (relationshits etc) lead to me being a bit messy. I’ll live though.

I find I escape a lot of trouble with compliments because I adore clothes so much. It’s much nicer and more reasonable to say ‘that dress is gorgeous’ than it is to say ‘nice tits love’. Plus the body doesn’t even come into (though it does of course, fit into it…hohoho).

I guess I really only end up complimenting the figures of women I know. I am blessed to be surrounded by people I think are gorgeous. My housemates, my friends, and most people I spend time with, are all stunning in their own unique ways. But then, I kinda think that everybody is. I doubt it’s simple statistical clustering (or even animal magnetism) that leads the gorgeous towards me. It must just be a universal thing.

So yeah, I’ve told Fanny (housemate) that she’s got a fantastic figure, because she has (she does T’ai Chi with me sometimes, and the curve of her legs and the way it flows around to her ass and back is pretty much a perfect line. I may ask to take some photos of her practising the form one day.) And most of my friends know I think they’re gorgeous, even if they think I’m only talking about their personalities.

But yeah…I think I don’t really have the balls to go up to a complete stranger and explain to them the strengths of their body.

Anyway, personal objectification is secondary to the main thrust of the post. Which is the strong women, in the videos, and the fine line between their sexual agression and their participation in their own objectification.

How capable would you feel to put yourself out there as an object, and can you see it as a way of empowering yourself….or are they just fulfilling a male dream by making themselves sexually available.

They may be strong…but they still want you to fuck them. Something like that.

All very disturbing really.

And there are many who don’t mind being reduced to T&A. Yep there are those too.
And then there’s the one that’s possibly giving you the finger at the same time, I’m doing this for me not for you sort of thing, it’s liable to give some guy some guy a hard on either way, so it’s win-win for the men, for the women not so much I think, until possibly the objectifiers turn into objectifees one day and learn what its like to be reduced to that. But I’m pulling stuff out of my butt cz that will never happen.


Where's The Comment Form?

  • Feed Me, See More

  • When

    June 2007
    M T W T F S S
    « May   Jul »
     123
    45678910
    11121314151617
    18192021222324
    252627282930  
  • Plumb the Depths

  • Add Some Music to Your Day

  • When the little blue bird…

    • 'Those who argue can't see past their noses.' 15 hours ago
    • And then twitter cocked it so that my explanation was delayed and now I look like a big Jodie Marsh fan. Oopsy 15 hours ago
    • For the record, I only retweeted that because I misread it as saying Richey Edwards was on BBLB. Now THAT would be a turn up for the books. 15 hours ago
    • @beatonna A 17th century Communist manifesto from a group of farmer's that occupied an unused heath in London. Go Diggers! 16 hours ago
    • @beatonna To be fair. It should never've had to be. For shorter forward thinking of that era go for the Diggers. fhttp://tinyurl.com/26bfz2 16 hours ago
  • Old

  • The Dirty Snake
  • Dis Clam ‘ere

    Alabaster Crippens doesn't entirely believe in objective truth, therefore he can neither confirm or deny the accuracy of any statement, image or impression caused by, or displayed on, these pages of the so called 'internet'. He does however not want to get sued, even if the lawyers, legal system, and the concept of jurisprudence doesn't exist. Therefore if you believe the nonsense posted on here you do so entirely at your own risk. In other words: Don't sue me 'cause I might not mean it. Basically, anything you hear from anyone is unreliable, so if you want the 'truth' you need the perspectives of as many people as you can get..ideally people who are trustworthy and close to the particular 'truth' you wish to inspect. If you start trusting idiots with silly (and obviously made up) names then you're developing some kind of problem. Check your sources, examine their own politcal (or other) motivation, remember that anything people say is opinion unless you are certain that they speak the 'truth'. Even your own eyes can lie. Trust me on that one. Or don't..it doesn't bother me. Finally, everything written here is, to the best of my knowledge written by me and I reserve my right to be recognised as the author of these works. Any input from other sources should be clearly shown, if you note a mistake or anything..tell me..I'll try and sort out the problem. Please ask me if you want to use anything for commercial reasons...I probably won't mind but I need to know I'm not supporting anything I don't want to support. This is an attempt at a legal notice written without legal knowledge. Just follow the principles, I think most of you get what I mean, even if it won't stand up in a court of law. Just be polite you know...like in the good ole days.

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...